Please visit the Net(work) blog at :

The structure of the event consisted a main performance area where audience members could sit and watch performances. Along the other VIVO walls were smaller "fair booths" that surrounded the main performance space. I was interested in this structure because I envisioned that people could move between watching the main performance in the middle and interacting with the performances on the periphery.
The reality was that when people walked in they immediately sat down and watched the center pieces, and were initially timid about visiting the performance booths. It was also hard to pull focus on the performances because all the pieces in the center and the sides were evenly lit. This made it difficult to create a mood and to hold that audiences undivided attention. However, it more responsibility on the audience to make meaning of the various components that were competing for their attention. My hope was that a greater sense of agency was achieved through synthesizing the fragmented information.
As the show went on and the performances in the center became more interactive, the audience members felt more comfortable branching out and exploring the booths. By the end of the show, the chairs in the center were removed allowing for a more free flowing and almost anarchistic environment where people were visiting the booths and congregating in the middle and even engaging in chair fights.
In my own performance as a "customer service representative" for the show I got audience members to take survey. I received a wealth of insight about what people thought was effective and in effective at the show based on the criteria presented within the survey. I got lots of suggestions about how to improve the show theme at many ends. Overall I felt the show was a really good learning experience and I plan on incorporating the feedback I received as well as the lessons that I learned from group dynamics into future shows.















